hero-image
HOME
hero-image
project-highlight-image

Additive Manufacturing vs. Stamping: Performance and Economic Crossover Analysis

hero-image
Sophia Hekman

Project Timeline

Oct 2025 - Nov-2025

OVERVIEW

Investigated the viability of replacing a commercially available, high-volume metal stamped bracket (Galvanized Low-Carbon Steel) with 3D-printed plastic alternatives for low-volume, specialized applications. The goal was to identify the economic and mechanical crossover point where the zero-tooling cost of additive manufacturing justifies the higher per-part material cost.

HighlightS

  • Validated Additive Manufacturing: Conclusively proved that specific 3D-printed composites (Markforged Onyx with continuous fiberglass and PETG) could match the maximum load capacity of the commercial steel bracket.
  • Engineered Custom Testing: Designed and fabricated a specialized testing rig and executed Static Load Tests using an Instron machine to accurately replicate real-world fence-post loading and record force vs. deflection data.
  • Advanced Analysis: Utilized SolidWorks FEA to predict stress distributions and potential failure points on CAD models, guiding material selection and test setup.
  • Identified Key Trade-offs: Determined that 3D printing successfully eliminates $15k–$60k in tooling costs and drastically reduces lead times, but introduces the risk of brittle failure modes versus the metal's ductile yield.


SKILLS

Materials Selection & CharacterizationAdditive Manufacturing (3D Printing)Mechanical Testing (Instron)Fixture/Test Rig DesignSolidWorks (CAD/FEA)Cost Analysis / Economic JustificationDesign of Experiments (DoE)Technical Report WritingTeam CollaborationFailure Analysis (Brittle vs. Ductile)

SUPPORTING MATERIALS

Additional Details

A measuring tape and a metal clamp

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Galvanized Steel Post Deformation



Galvanized Steel Load vs. Extension Curve



A measuring tape and a white object

AI-generated content may be incorrect. A measuring tape and a plastic piece

AI-generated content may be incorrect.


Figure 5: TPU Post Deformation and Failure Point



TPU Load vs. Extension Curve




A transparent object with yellow and purple handles

AI-generated content may be incorrect.            A multicolored object with holes

AI-generated content may be incorrect.                   A measuring tape and a black metal ring

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Fiberglass Inlay Pattern, FEA Results, Markforged Post Deformation  

Markforged Onyx with Fiberglass Inlay Load vs. Extension Curve



A tape measure next to a white piece of paper

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

PETG Post Deformation



PETG Load vs. Extension Curve




Markforged, PETG, and Steel Load vs. Extension Curve Comparison




Cost Comparison of Low-Volume Production

Cost Comparison of High-Volume Production


A close-up of a measuring tape

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Deformation of Testing Rig

A close-up of a machine

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Testing Rig Setup

lowinertia
Portfolio Builder for Engineers
Created by Aram Lee
© 2025 Low Inertia. All rights reserved.